Hi GuysSo we decided to go with PowerMILL for a number of reasons.We have had the machine now for 6 months and the software for about 4 months now and we are still having major issues with the postprocessor. The local support office are trying but they are based in Aussie and we are in NZ so it is proving difficult to explain the problems we are having over email.Is there any one out there who is running PM 5 axis on the Seimens 840D SL controller? We have a Spinner U5 620, I am pretty sure that there are companies out there running the same combination but may not be on here. Even if we could get hold of the option file for the 840D running on a different Machine at least it will give us somewhere to start.We made some progress with it but the more our operator gets into the software the more problems we seem to have and we are considering taking a step backwards and sorting out a 3 axis post then developing that into a 3+2 and then 5 axis.Any feedback would be much appreciatedThanksAndrew.
Hi GuysThanks for everyones input, I have stepped back from running of the machine but have started taking on a bit more responsibilty within our CNC Dept. Part of my role is helping the rest of our CNC team with getting the most from the machines and software.We have had one of the guys over from Australia for a week and it seems that we have finally got our post file 99% sorted. There are still a few things that aren't right but at least we are able to have the Machine working at last.We have noticed that the support could be better, however I am not sure what was included in the sofware packageThanksAndrew.
As much as I like Delcam and Featurecam I decided the company is falling apart from poor customer service. If you use the forums now your post have to be approved by a moderator before it is put online. This can take up to a week so if you need help your srewed. Just my opinion but I would send the delcam back and pick up NX since it is made for siemens and you should have no bugs right out of the box.Uhhhhh. Maybe it's you?
I just posted and it went up immediately. Same experience in the past.
Have you stepped on anyone's toes?
Delcam Powermill Mach3 Post Processor -Powermill to Mach3 post. There is some one that have fanuc6 post processor for powermill, I have. The DelCAM forum is your best bet.
DELCAM creates a post-processor for PowerMILL, compatible,. Delcam Powermill Mach3 Post Processor, Steve Gadd and Friends - Live at Voce (2010). Receive free downloads of our posts for CAD/CAM software products. The following is the list of post-processors that will work with MecSoft. 2014-3-5 Post Processor for Mach 3 I Mach3 postprocessor You can try this opt file Attached. DELCAM creates a post-processor for PowerMILL, compatible.
PowerMILL Postprocessors. HellerFT4000S840.pmopt, (postprocessor for machine Heller FT4000, head - table configuration (B-C), control with. Delcam's PowerMill is a favorite when it comes to 5 axis CAM.
Because the simulation tool is driven together with Post processor, your code. Autodesk Post Processor Manual. Intended audience. Skill level of audience. Why we need posts. Overview of post processor.
Delcam Powermill Post Processor For Mach3 11 -. Look at most relevant Post processor delcam mach3 websites out of 4.49. DELCAM creates a post-processor for PowerMILL, compatible with FAGOR CNCs PowerMILL:. The Mach3 Controller Post processor for Various CNC. Mach3 PowerMill. CAD CAM (PowerMILL) PostProcessor (PostProcessor, PMPost, DuctPost) CNC. Information contained in this manual is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment.
The software described in this. It works with the Delcam Powermill software which is a CAM product. The post processor is specific to Powermill and Mach3.
Delcam Powermill Mach3 Post Processor. Hi, Does anyone have the post processor FANUC 21i mb?. Post processor I found in another forum, it's supposed to work with Mach3 and some models of Fanuc,. Delcam User Forum.
View topic - Posts for Powermill. And my controller is using Mach 3. I have tried using the Powermill to output my nccode,but can't find a powermill's post processor for Mach3. Delcam Powermill Mach3 Post Processor. Updated 10 months ago. About 0 Discussions 0 Change Requests.
I installed the Fanuc Post Processor form PowerMill. It seems to generate codes OK., but i get a funny move upon startup after a G43 Code. 5 Oct 2017 - 15 min - Uploaded by CAD/CAM SOLUTIONAutodesk PowerMill 2017 - Post Processor Fanuc 4 Axis-Table - Edit post processor 4.
Hello Friends this is Sourbh, I just wants to share the post processor for the CNC Milling/Lathe and wire EDM which base is MACH 3 Controller. Delcam Powermill Mach3 Post Processor 5d8a1e7654. Z5.2 G1Z.2F60 X59.4 G0Z10. VERY URGENTTTTT THANKSSSSSS selinkarakasrichmondbrooks.com.4f22b66579.
Download PostsThe following is the list of post-processors that will work with MecSoft CAD/CAM Software products.To use post-processor from the list, download the post (a.spm file) and move in into the corresponding folder under the Posts folder under the CAM plug-in installation folder.
Howdy!When I started this blog I knew it would be hard to update it in an often basis but I didn’t know it would be so hard! Hello Anders,There are two standards groups that have been responsible for setting the standards for the APT Language and the NC machine code (M&G). The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Electronics Industries Association (EIA). Modern Machine Shop used to publish a list of these NC specific stardards by number. I have a copy.
Steam. Dec 16, 2017 In Windows 10, you can change your apps instantly from light mode to dark mode – great for low-light conditions like working at night. When you make the switch, UWP (Universal Windows Platform) apps including Mail, Calendar and the Windows. Jul 26, 2017 Dark and Light. All Discussions. Which one of these settings if any makes the skill gains increase faster? For example leveling tamign is super slow can you increase the skill gained from crafting items? Also is it possible to increase crafting speed? Last edited by gerokzule; Aug 4.
I also have hard copies of some of the standards (I was an IBM rep.). The standards are public domain, but you would have to pay to get a copy from the Gov’t. Archive in Washington. The APT manual will not have what you are looking for. It contains the APT programming language not the Source CLfile standard (SCL).
You are looking for the “ANS X3.37 -1993 Programming Language APT” standards documentation Chapter 4 “APT OUTPUT DATA” Chapter 4.1.3 “SOURCE CLDATA (SCL)”.I have this document and can e-mail you a copy of this section.Each CAM vendor has thier variant of this standard (CATIA, UG-NX, ProE, SurfCAM, etc.) then MasterCAM has thier own totaly different output format (NCI). This makes writting postprocessors for all CAM systems interesting!
MasterCAM NCI to APT SCL converters are available. I also have the documentation for the MasterCAM NCI that I can send you. I also have the documentation for the CATIA variant of the SCL format that I can send you.
Send me an e-mail at NCDataServices web site. I really appreciate your post on the post processors. But I think it is too based on the APT technology. Today modern CAM software uses their own technology postprocessor.
Post Processor Powermill Configuration 1
Solutions such as WorkNC, Powermill, Tebis, HyperMILL, TopSolid are using their own generators. The new role of the postprocessor is to convert an internal code into the right ISO format. In multi-axis environement integrated machine simulation already produce a XYZ ABC code adapted to the kinematic and the axis limitations of the machine.
Post Processor Powermill Configuration Software
APT code is no longer adapted to 5-axis machining. Your recommendations are still valid concerning “the things to consider” but for me the future is not for small companies but to integrated postprocessors. What are the CAM systems simulating in the kinematics?
The CAM tool path or the machine tool code? If it’s not the machine tool code you are in for a crash. The APT source CLfile in the aerospace & defence industry is considered a “part” is given a number and is signed of on. The aerospace supply chain would almost collapse if there was no APT sourceCLfile. This CLfile can be created at one site then transported (by e-mail) between companies and then postprocessed at site where the target machine tool is.Best regards,Larry.
As you can see I have a different opinion on the issue. User of solutions which doesn’t use the APT code to generate the final Iso code, for me this vision is over.
The beginnings of APT date from 1959 at the same time as the Boeing 707 or a douglas DC-8. I don’t think that the Aerospace industry are oblige to be linked with this technology. I know a lot of companies working in this area without ever having ever heard of the APT format. But I don’t want to open here a controversy.That’s an other point who is for me much more important. You mention the fact that if an integrated simulation is not based on the final ISO code it would necessary cause a collision.
On this point I’m definitely not agree. Again: the modern CAM system offer a reliable simulation. But do not go through the APT output of your software.APT code does not contain the real value of the machine axes (ABC). Orientation of the tool is given by the vector IJK and under these conditions it’s certain that we can use all the existing simulation, the calcul of the coordinates by the postprocessor with these limited infomations, forced to re-do a simulation of the final code.I don’t want to advertise here, but as Tebis user I can assure that his integrated simulation software offer a really reliable simulation. And no simulation is necessary on the final code:But of course the software internally uses a format very similar to the ISO (NGXYZACF) and movements imposed in the software are faithfully outputs when generating the ISO code. With a proper configuration I could also say the same of TopSolid, WorkNCAnd if I take the example below, I am absolutely certain that the realization of this part has never seen a piece of APT code. Yet it appears that the company Goodrich is working in the field of aeronautics without that his world collapses.So it is necessary for me to say that the simulation included in the CAM system can work.
It does not work if you allow your toolpath to be denatured by the use of an obsolete format and if you give to a black box, “the post-processor” the task of generating your machine code without using the possibilities of control included in a modern software.Regards,Laurent. Hi Laurent,I agree with many of your points too I’m neutral in regards the CL formats in fact, this post didn’t have any intention to be focused in APT, I apologize if I passed this impression. Sometimes it seems that APT is a four letter word. All I am saying is that there is a need by the industry for an interface between the CAD/CAM system and the CNC machine tool that can be controlled by the user.
This need is being satisfied by the CLfile (APT SCL?) and the postprocessor. I also believe that simulation should be done with the same code that drives the CNC machine tool (check everything possible) or as close as possible.I once was teaching a CAD/CAM manufacturing class at Northrop-Gruman to a visiting group of Aisias and was asked by a Northrop exec if he could interupt. I said “yes” and he told the group that by the year 2000 that there would be no need for manufacturing engineers or CNC programmers. I will be also interesting to have your point of view on an other topics ( perhaps a new very interesting post?:)This point concern a related subject SIMULATION.
Thank you for an excellent article about the perils of post-processors. I share your goal of making a post able to have my CAM intent tranlated into code that can go straight to the machine and be run without edits or (ideally) without a prove-out guy standing with his hand over the rapid-reduce knob. I call this a “bomb proof” post processor.My ultimate goal (though I doubt I will ever achieve it) is to put a brand new, freshly posted program in the machine, press the button and go home only to return the follwing day to have a perfect part waiting for me.In my experience, two of the big danger areas in post processor writing are tool changing and 4th or 5th axis repositioning. I have no time for trying to show off by indexing the table (or spindle) with the tool hovering millimetres above the part.
In my world very low volume and high complexity) I can live with a minute or two of cycle time but I can’t live with a smashed up spindle.Great stuff – please keep it up.Bob.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |